Blog

What an ideal coaching client actually is, and why the avatar exercise predicts nothing

4 things to know from this article

You've probably filled in an ideal client worksheet. Name her, age her, give her a job, an income bracket, a podcast she listens to, a fear she'd never admit. Then you wrote your homepage and it still didn't sound like it was for anybody.

In this article I'm showing you what actually separates one coaching buyer from another, from 918 coaching markets we mapped from 2,004 books and 1,547 things real buyers wrote down. Get this wrong and none of the three jobs that turn a stranger into a client can be done, because all three depend on knowing who's reading.

Here's the finding that broke the avatar exercise for me. 90.6% of the 117 main coaching niches contain buyers at more than one stage of awareness. Same subject, same age, same income, completely different conversation.

What actually separates one buyer from another?

Three things, and none of them are on the worksheet.

What pushed her to look today. Not the problem in general. The specific event last Tuesday. Her boss said something in a meeting. The scan came back. Her daughter moved out. The push is what she types into a search box, almost word for word.

Whether she knows what fixes it. We tagged all 918 markets for this. 38.9% are markets where the buyer knows exactly what's wrong and has no idea what to do about it. 52.2% are markets where she already knows the kind of solution she wants and is choosing between them. Those two people need opposite first sentences. One needs her problem named. The other needs to know why your version is different.

What she's afraid of about buying. Every market has one and it's specific. Am I just lazy. Will people think I couldn't cope. Is this going to be another thing I start and drop. Say it out loud and you handle the objection before she makes it.

Why doesn't the demographic version work?

Because the same woman at two different moments is two different buyers, and the worksheet only describes her once.

Take one example from our data. Under ADHD and neurodiversity, the broad market is problem-aware: people asking whether they're lazy or whether it's a condition. One level down, the productivity and executive function sub-market is solution-aware: people who've accepted the diagnosis and are shopping for a system that works.

Identical demographics. The first needs the self-blame handled before anything else. The second is bored of being told to be kind to herself and wants the method.

That pattern holds across the whole set. 30.6% of the 918 sub-markets sit at a different stage of awareness from the broader niche they belong to, and 79.8% buy differently in some way. Which is the real answer to why your copy feels generic: you're writing to an average of two people who want opposite things.

Is the ideal client the one who pays most?

No, and this is where "ideal" does real damage.

The useful definition is the one where all three of these are true at once: she has the push, she can name the problem, and you've solved that exact thing before. Not highest budget. Not easiest to work with.

A coach who chases the highest-paying version of her market usually ends up at level 4 or 5 sophistication, where buyers have heard every claim already. 47.7% of the markets we mapped are at that level, and they're the hardest rooms to walk into new. The quieter sub-market one level down has the same money in it and a fraction of the noise. There's more on that in why profitable is the wrong question.

So what do you write down instead?

Four lines, and they're all things she'd recognise.

  1. The event that made her look. In her words, not yours.
  2. What she'd type into a search box that week.
  3. What she's already tried and why it didn't hold.
  4. The thing she's afraid is true about her.

Fill those in and the homepage writes itself, because every one of them is a sentence she can recognise herself in. Fill in her age and her podcast and you've got a character sketch nobody can recognise anything in.

If you're not sure which market you're even describing, a niche and an audience aren't the same thing sorts that out first. Then the three jobs a stranger puts you through tells you what to do with it.

Where our data runs out

We mapped what buyers in 918 markets say and what drives them. We didn't interview your clients, and there's no substitute for that.

Could your market behave differently from what we found? Yes. If you've had twenty sales conversations you know things about your buyers that 2,004 books don't. Our data is the starting point for somebody who hasn't had those conversations yet, and the check on somebody who's had ten and drawn the wrong conclusion.

Are 117 niches and 918 sub-markets the real number? Maybe there are more. What we learned about how they split is worth more than the count.

You can look up what your own market's buyers are driven by and see the push, the anxiety and the awareness stage for it.

Questions coaches ask about this

What is an ideal coaching client?

Somebody with a specific push to act, who can name her problem, and whose problem you've solved before. Budget and personality come after those three. In 38.9% of the markets we mapped she can name the problem and has no idea what fixes it.

How do I find my ideal coaching client?

By writing down the event that made her look and the words she'd search, rather than her age and income. 90.6% of coaching niches contain buyers at more than one stage of awareness, so demographics can't tell you which conversation you're in.

Is an ideal client avatar worth doing?

The demographic version predicts almost nothing. Replace it with four lines: what pushed her, what she'd search, what she's already tried, and what she's afraid is true about her.

How specific should my ideal client be?

Specific enough that one sentence sends the wrong people away. 79.8% of sub-markets buy differently from the broader niche above them, so "women in their forties" is usually four markets wearing one coat.

Read next